Back in June I enjoyed meeting with colleagues at the 2009
North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, the biennial meeting of
the International Society for Knowledge Organization–Chapter for Canada and
the United States, held at Syracuse University. (Just to be clear: NASKO refers only to the biennial meeting,
while ISKO–C/US [unfortunately, we can all figure out how that acronym is going
to end up being pronounced!] refers to the ISKO chapter.)
The School of Information Studies at Syracuse hosted
the symposium in splendid style. In
welcoming us, Dean Liz Liddy noted that NASKO was the first conference to be
held in their newly renovated building and expressed how appropriate it was
that the first meeting there should be one dedicated to knowledge
organization. “Classification is really
the core of every endeavor; I value your work.”
It was gratifying to be appreciated for what we collectively do.
The theme for the symposium, the first official meeting of
the chapter, was Pioneering North American Contributions
to Knowledge Organization. The goal of
the symposium was to serve as an “occasion . . . to take stock of our
past in light of the present and with an eye to how this living heritage might
be leveraged for the future.”
Several of the papers (all of which are available on
dLIST) addressed themes relevant to our work with the DDC. Through the lens of Paul Ricoeur’s
distinction between language and discourse, Grant Campbell addressed the
tension between global and local perspectives in knowledge organization: how can our systems be interoperable, which would
enable access to information resources on a global level, but still preserve
that which is specific to the cultures and communities they serve? Linda Hill presented a paper on
geocoding in KO, a topic that editor Michael Panzer has also been
exploring of late. One of two papers
presented by Tom Dousa examined evolutionary order in the theories and
classificatory practices of Ernest Cushing Richardson and Charles Ammi Cutter,
contemporaries of Melvil Dewey.
Lastly, I presented a paper on the notational system
that Melvil Dewey devised for the DDC. (I always love it when Dewey gets the last
word!) Just to whet your appetite, I
repeat here the paper’s abstract:
“Historically, the notational system of the Dewey Decimal Classification
provided for non-institution-specific, relative location shelf arrangements,
thus substantially reducing bibliographic classification effort. Today its
decimal notation continues to provide the classification scheme with flexible
granularity, is hospitable to expansion, expresses relationships, interfaces
well with modern retrieval systems, and is internationally understood.”
Recent Comments