« Dewey Breakfast/Update at ALA Midwinter | Main | Transgendered and Intersex People »

January 08, 2008

Trans-Neptunian Objects

We are planning an update to 523.4 Planets of the solar system and would like feedback on the proposed new development. Because of the recent reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet by astronomers and the discovery of other Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), the following development in Edition 22 is out of date:
        523.48    Trans-Uranian planets
        523.481        *Neptune
        523.482        *Pluto
*Add as instructed under 523.4

We propose to modify the schedule as follows:
        523.48  *Neptune
        523.49    Trans-Neptunian objects
        523.492        Kuiper belt objects
        523.4922            *Pluto
        523.494        Scattered disk objects
        523.497        Oort cloud objects
*Add as instructed under 523.4

The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) has approved the new development in principle, but requested that we seek user feedback before implementing the change.  Please either post your comments directly to this blog entry or direct your comments to dewey@loc.gov by February 15, 2008.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d500f53ef00e54fc598cd8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trans-Neptunian Objects:

Comments

I always felt Pluto should be 523.49 anyway. I'm a LMA in an elementary school in Virginia so we don't use but 2 or 3 decimals anyway so 523.49 would work best for us.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment