Back to PLA, then, for one last note
of the goings-on at this excellent meeting. The Dewey-blog contingent decided
that, since we'd spent much of the week learning about what the big names are up
to, what we really needed was a sense of how the smaller, independent, unsung
heroes of Libraryland are coping with everything the 21st century is throwing at
them. So we thought we'd check out what Google, Inc., a lesser-known Mountain
View, CA, company is doing in the name of organizing the world's information and
making it universally accessible and useful. Which is quite a lot, as it
happens. Actually, that bit about "organizing the world's information [etc.]"?
Turns out that's Google's mission, and we know that for sure because Ben Bunnell
told us 142 times in his talk on Thursday. Ben captured all our hearts with his
bright-'n'-breezy overview of Google Book Search (whereby Google aims to
index "every word in every book") and Google Scholar (ditto for scholarly
journal articles); and then, on Friday, David Ferriero (director of research
libraries at New York Public Library) brought us up-to-date with a chronological
account of the challenges Google and its five partner libraries continue to face
in providing access, through Book Search, to the copyrighted works held by those
libraries. Both speakers gave shout-outs to OCLC's collection
analysis of the "Google Five" (NYPL and the university libraries of Harvard,
Michigan, Oxford, and Stanford), which found that 60% of all the works that the
libraries collectively hold are represented in only one of the five. Many of the
records that you'll retrieve when you use Book Search come complete with a "Find
in a Library" link to OCLC's Open WorldCat, which lets you
determine whether books are available in your local library; Google's intention is to
extend this feature to more records in the near future. Now: Wouldn't it be cool
if Book Search grouped subsets of search results into subject categories, so
that users could browse classes of related material? Oh, but I guess that would
require the books already to have been assigned class numbers or something. Hmm.
Hang on a minute ...
Recent Comments